Dark Government complete comments | "Copy" Right | Forum

Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Forum Options

Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Dark Government complete comments
December 1, 2012
8:54 pm
cyber west hollyweird
Forum Posts: 124
Member Since:
November 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

We need to begin calling it what it is "Text-right" and no longer "Copy-right" which allows corporations & publishers the canardthat suggests that we cannot "copy" Copy.  

  The word "Copy" in the term "copyright" is a noun meaning the "Text/copy" itself and is not a verb meaning to "reproduce (copying)" the text/copy.  It is Text/copy in the sense of "Copy-boy bring me the newspaper copy," or in Britain instead of textbooks they have copybooks.
   We The People have both Personal Use reproduction right & Educational Use reproduction right for this Public Grant which We The People give, in the first place, to Authors (and not to Publishers & Corporations whom are the real Pirates against the Progress of Science and the useful Arts by Pirating "Text/copy" right from citizen authors).  Without Our Public Grant of "Text-right" there is no protection.
  Movies, television, stage plays, DVDs et cetera are considered "Legal Fiction Texts" for "Text/copy-right" purpose.
  The reason We The People have Personal Use & Educational Use reproduction right is the obligation authors have towards promoting the Progress of Science and useful Arts of collectively We The People citizens (a corporation or a publisher are not citizens or persons because we cannot sell a citizen or person to a foreign interest but corporations or publishers can be sold to foreign interests even though they are allowed to make bribes, 'er, political campaign contributions as if they were a citizen/person) because We The People give Text/copy-right Protection to authors as a Public Grant to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts to society collectively in Article I Section 8 of The Constitution.  Nowhere in the Constitution are corporate or publishing Pirates mentioned because traditionally before the Constitution they (as well as governments) had been "stealing" text/copy-right from individual authors.
  You can read more here with my letter to President Obama regarding SOPA and Berne and the WTO on "Improper copyright notice (canards)" /forum/?page_id=4/copy-right/a-letter-concerning-copy-right-to-the-white-house/
  And you may want to order the book The Nature Of Copyright: A Law Of User's Rights to peruse ie=UTF8&qid=1354392304&sr=1-1&keywords=the+nature+of+copyright+a+law+of+user%27s+rights
  Further, there should be NO software "Text/copy-right" as all computer programs are electromagnetic Processes that run a computer's CPU (Central Processing Unit)  and NO Process May be Copyrighted, All Processes Must be Patented or fall into We The People's Public Domain.  Software "Text/copy-right" is Bill Gates own legalese Canard when he should have applied for Patents for his software electromagnetic Processes.
  And a kid using a Pop song or movie video clip on YouTube can be considered both Personal Use and Educational Use (to someone who learns something creative from it) in the Promotion of the useful Arts.  Besides, it is free word-of-mouth advertising and promotion of the Pop song or movie or video clip for the corporations and other "Legal Fiction Publishers."
  Matter of fact, We The People give the Public Grant of incorporation to the corporate Pirates, so why don't we just un-Grant their existence when they try to manipulate how We The People think by their legal department canards?
Forum Timezone: America/New_York
Most Users Ever Online: 169
Currently Online:
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 3
Members: 12
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 15
Forums: 104
Topics: 151
Posts: 287
Newest Members:
Main | Rapture Insurance | Collectibles | Contact | Brian McCabe's Art