A letter concerning "Copy" Right to The White House. | "Copy" Right | Forum

Avatar
Lost password?
Advanced Search
Forum Scope


Match



Forum Options



Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
A letter concerning "Copy" Right to The White House.
January 19, 2012
2:04 am
Avatar
cyber west hollyweird
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 121
Member Since:
November 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Copyright email to the White House:
 
  The term "Copy" in "Copy-right" is a noun meaning the "Text" of an Author's "copy ("Copy-boy, bring us the newspaper copy") and not a verb meaning "reproducing (copying)."
Copyright and Patent protection in Article (not amendment) I, Section 8 of the Constitution were put there after the American Revolution because British Publishers had been stealing (Pirating) "Text/copy" Right from Authors and the British Government had been sitting on "Text/copy" Right to suppress Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press (again, this is Article I before the Bill of Rights 1st Amendment was added to the Constitution).
  It was to protect Author's from Publishers & Corporations--Piracy--neither of which are mentioned in the Constitution for this very reason.
  Also it was "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts" for We the People who make the Public Grant of copyright protection available to Authors, that Authors have an obligation of "Personal Use" and "Educational Use" reproduction of "Text/copy," to which Publishers & Corporations have been giving FBI "Improper Text/copy Right Notice" for years trying to fool We The People into believing We don't have "Personal Use" and "Educational Use" "Text/copy" reproduction Rights, for without our, We The People, Public Grant Author's HAVE NO PROTECTION from Publishers' & Corporations' Piracy. Sound Familiar?
  I've ordered a text book from the University of Georgia Press on the History of "Text/copy" right I am going to send to the President so there will be no excuse to not know that both SOPA and Berne are Unconstitutional.
Regards,
Dawson

January 19, 2012
2:48 am
Avatar
cyber west hollyweird
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 121
Member Since:
November 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

  I will write on this in more detail later.  The White House gives you more characters than Twitter, but proportionally for the National Interest not really enough.

  I guess that's what U.S.P.S. snail mail is still for while we still have it.

  If You are interested in reading the text book (or as they say in Britain "copy book") "The Nature of Copyright: A Law of User's Rights" by L. Ray Patterson and Stanley W. Lindberg, University of Georgia Press, or ordering a book for your Senators and Representatives (I'm sending President Obama his) :

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb.....ooks%2C240

 

  In these days of your Constitutional Rights being wrested away by Berne and the WTO (World Trade Organization), both just Fronts for Multinational Corporations trying to circumvent the supreme Law of the Land, "The Nature of Copyright: A Law of User's Rights" makes darn good bathroom reading material.

  And notice its subtitle: "A Law of User's Rights!"  We The People are the Users  who Grant Author's "Text/copy" Right Protection for publishing text/copy.

  What we need to do is Grant some of  "The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the Several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution;...(Article VI)" a Recall from their Offices for being in violation of their Oaths to Our, We The People's, Constitution as they suck up to and Front for Corporate takeover of your Rights and Freedoms. 

  Remember, Articles of Incorporation (creating a "Legal Fiction Person" corporation), or worse, "Limited Liability (Don't blame us for anything) Incorporation," are also Public Grants by We The People which can become null and void by removal of Our Public Grant to stop letting them turn We The People into their Ca$h Cows. 

  Hey, the choice is We The People, Yours!

January 21, 2012
9:12 pm
Avatar
cyber west hollyweird
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 121
Member Since:
November 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The White House Staff Response email:

 

    Response to Your Message

 

 Reply |The White House mailto:no-reply@correspondence.whitehouse.gov.
 
Thank you, again, for writing.

Sincerely,

The White House

 
 
You are receiving this one-time email because you contacted the White House about a particular issue.

If you are interested in receiving regular updates from President Obama and senior White House officials, please visit our subscription page to sign up:  http://www.whitehouse.gov/get-.....il-updates

The White House • 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. • Washington, D.C.  20500 • 202-456-1111

February 2, 2012
1:53 am
Avatar
Lydia Lee
Guest
Guests

Okay. I will finally break down and get a copy of this book. Law is just such boring reading. I worked in the legal department of a company, reading and sorting contracts. Mind-numbingly B-O-R-I-N-G. Important, to be sure, but ugh! Laugh

December 1, 2012
8:58 pm
Avatar
cyber west hollyweird
Member
Members
Forum Posts: 121
Member Since:
November 11, 2011
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Complete Dark Govenment newletter comments:

 

  We need to begin calling it what it is "Text-right" and no longer "Copy-right" which allows corporations & publishers the canardthat suggests that we cannot "copy" Copy.  

 
  The word "Copy" in the term "copyright" is a noun meaning the "Text/copy" itself and is not a verb meaning to "reproduce (copying)" the text/copy.  It is Text/copy in the sense of "Copy-boy bring me the newspaper copy," or in Britain instead of textbooks they have copybooks.
 
   We The People have both Personal Use reproduction right & Educational Use reproduction right for this Public Grant which We The People give, in the first place, to Authors (and not to Publishers & Corporations whom are the real Pirates against the Progress of Science and the useful Arts by Pirating "Text/copy" right from citizen authors).  Without Our Public Grant of "Text-right" there is no protection.
 
  Movies, television, stage plays, DVDs et cetera are considered "Legal Fiction Texts" for "Text/copy-right" purpose.
 
  The reason We The People have Personal Use & Educational Use reproduction right is the obligation authors have towards promoting the Progress of Science and useful Arts of collectively We The People citizens (a corporation or a publisher are not citizens or persons because we cannot sell a citizen or person to a foreign interest but corporations or publishers can be sold to foreign interests even though they are allowed to make bribes, 'er, political campaign contributions as if they were a citizen/person) because We The People give Text/copy-right Protection to authors as a Public Grant to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts to society collectively in Article I Section 8 of The Constitution.  Nowhere in the Constitution are corporate or publishing Pirates mentioned because traditionally before the Constitution they (as well as governments) had been "stealing" text/copy-right from individual authors
 
  You can read more here with my letter to President Obama regarding SOPA and Berne and the WTO on "Improper copyright notice (canards)" /forum/?page_id=4/copy-right/a-letter-concerning-copy-right-to-the-white-house/
 
  And you may want to order the book The Nature Of Copyright: A Law Of User's Rights to peruse http://www.amazon.com/Nature-C.....27s+rights
 
  Further, there should be NO software "Text/copy-right" as all computer programs are electromagnetic Processes that run a computer's CPU (Central Processing Unit)  and NO Process May be Copyrighted, All Processes Must be Patented or fall into We The People's Public Domain.  Software "Text/copy-right" is Bill Gates own legalese Canard when he should have applied for Patents for his software electromagnetic Processes.
 
  And a kid using a Pop song or movie video clip on YouTube can be considered both Personal Use and Educational Use (to someone who learns something creative from it) in the Promotion of the useful Arts.  Besides, it is free word-of-mouth advertising and promotion of the Pop song or movie or video clip for the corporations and other "Legal Fiction Publishers."
 
  Matter of fact, We The People give the Public Grant of incorporation to the corporate Pirates, so why don't we just un-Grant their existence when they try to manipulate how We The People think by their legal department canards?
Forum Timezone: America/New_York
Most Users Ever Online: 115
Currently Online:
4
Guest(s)
Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)
Member Stats:
Guest Posters: 3
Members: 12
Moderators: 0
Admins: 2
Forum Stats:
Groups: 15
Forums: 102
Topics: 149
Posts: 282
Newest Members:
Main | Rapture Insurance | Collectibles | Contact | Brian McCabe's Art